Today is the last day to give feedback, in survey form, on the revised draft Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, available here.
Here is how I filled out the survey. Note what they are asking for feedback on, and what they are not.
1. How satisfied are you with the overall Framework?
I remain concerned about the use of the term "metaliteracy," indistinguishable from "information literacy," as I see it, and the use of threshold concepts generated by a Delphi study (see Lane Wilkinson's excellent post on this), but otherwise I like the flexibility, the way it encourages collaboration with faculty and administration, and its potential to help make information literacy a more integrated part of academic communities. I like the definition of "information literacy."
2. If you have followed the development of the Framework through the previous draft, please tell us what changes you find most helpful.
The addition of an FAQ and supporting documents further flesh out the Framework. I also find the knowledge practices and dispositions useful.
3. Does the “Suggestions on How to Use the Information Literacy Framework” section, in conjunction with the Frames, help you to engage other campus stakeholders in conversation?
I hoped this part of the Framework would detail some strategies for engaging faculty and campus administration in a variety of college and university settings, but maybe that is better suited for a supporting document, which I look forward to reading. The more granular the task force gets with this, in more settings, the better implementations will be.
4. How might the Framework affect the way you work with students?
This depends in large part on how we in the library work with faculty. Will we be able to transition from one-shot library instruction sessions to something more expansive, across the curricula? That will be key. And because of how we're staffed, a lot of information literacy instruction will fall to faculty. Do they want to do that? Do we librarians and library staff want them to?
5. What one thing do you most want the Task Force members to know about the draft Framework?
Please keep being transparent and open-minded, please do listen to critiques of metaliteracy and the threshold concepts, which I believe make up a plurality of the criticism so far.
6. Please share any additional information that would help us in understanding your perspective on the proposed Framework.
My criticism is constructive, comes from a desire to make us all the best librarians, and educators, we can be.
My thoughts on the Framework thus far:
The (Second) Draft Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: My Thoughts
Ethics, Copyright, and Information Literacy, Letters to a Young Librarian
The Draft Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Some Initial Thoughts
The Draft Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Survey Feedback